Engineering and architecture
Structural calculation packages: can they be licensed?
By SourceX Editorial · Reviewed by Noah Loul ·
Short answer
Structural calculation packages can often be licensed in part, because many are the engineering firm's instruments of service, but they carry project identity, sealed status and client confidentiality. Remove seals, signatures, project names and client details; keep design criteria, load assumptions, design checks and checker notes; and exclude delegated designs and peer reviews of other firms' work.
Key takeaways
- Calculation packages are often the engineer's instruments of service, but the signed client contract decides each project.
- Seals, signatures and license numbers are always removed, and licensed calcs are never presented as approved designs.
- Design criteria, load assumptions and checker comments carry most of the value for AI developers.
- Delegated designs, peer reviews of others' work and security-sensitive projects are usually excluded.
- Automated redaction misses things, so scanned hand calcs and title blocks need a human review.
Can a structural engineering firm license its calculation packages?#
A structural engineering firm can often license calculation packages from its own projects, provided the client contract leaves ownership with the firm and no confidentiality term covers the work. Many owner-engineer agreements treat calculations as instruments of service owned by the engineer, with a license to the client to use them for the project. EJCDC owner-engineer forms, for example, have said that the engineer's documents are instruments of service and that the engineer retains an ownership and property interest, including the copyright and the right of reuse, whether or not the project is completed; wording varies by edition and by negotiation.
That starting point has exceptions. Some negotiated contracts transfer ownership of all project documents to the client, some impose confidentiality on everything produced, and some projects are restricted for security reasons. The answer is project by project, and a rights review sorts the archive into eligible and excluded groups before anything is prepared.
Start with the ownership-of-documents clause, then read the confidentiality, publicity and reuse clauses near it. A clause that puts the risk on a client who reuses documents on other projects suggests the firm expected to keep its rights; a work-made-for-hire or assignment clause points the other way.
What is in a calc package, and which parts carry value?#
A calculation package bundles the design basis, the analysis and the checks for a structure, and its parts differ sharply in value and sensitivity. The reasoning layers, such as criteria, assumptions and checker comments, matter more to AI developers than the final member sizes.
Packages that show iteration are especially useful: a connection redesigned after a check, a load assumption revised after a client decision, a note explaining why a conservative approach was chosen.
| Component | Value for AI development | Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|
| Design criteria and basis of design | High: shows the codes, loads and performance goals chosen | Project identity in headers |
| Load assumptions and combinations | High: shows engineering judgment on loading | Low once project details are removed |
| Member and connection design checks | Medium to high: shows method and iteration | Low |
| Analysis software input and output | Medium: shows modeling choices | Formats tied to specific software |
| Hand calcs and Mathcad worksheets | High: shows reasoning step by step | Handwriting, initials and stamps need review |
| Checker markups and QA review notes | High: shows errors caught and corrected | Reviewer names and liability context |
| Revision log | Medium: shows how the design changed | Dates and names |
| Seal, signature and cover sheet | None | Always removed |
Seals, sealed status and permitted use#
Seals and signatures are always removed from licensed calculation packages, along with license numbers and any statement that the calculations are approved or issued for construction. A licensed calc is a record of how engineers worked, not a design anyone may rely on.
The license agreement should say so directly. A permitted use clause can limit the licensee to training, evaluation and research, and exclude any reliance on the records for design, construction or permitting. That language protects the firm and makes the licensee's obligations unambiguous.
Ask the firm's professional liability insurer whether licensing records of sealed work raises any coverage question before a scope is set. Carriers differ, and an early conversation avoids surprises later.
Which calc packages to leave out#
Some calculation packages should be left out even when the firm arguably owns them, because the risk outweighs the value or the work was never really the firm's. The exclusion list is usually short but firm.
Write exclusions into the scope document by project number so nobody adds them back during preparation.
- Delegated design calculations prepared by a contractor's engineer, such as stairs, curtain wall or precast connections.
- Peer reviews and third-party checks of another firm's design.
- Projects with security-sensitive programs or blanket confidentiality clauses.
- Projects involving failures, open claims or legal holds.
- Calculations built on proprietary manufacturer data the firm may not redistribute.
- Work for clients whose contracts transferred ownership of all documents.
Remove and keep: a preparation checklist#
A preparation checklist turns these rules into repeatable steps, which matters because calc packages mix typed output, scanned pages and handwriting. The checklist below covers what most structural packages need.
Redaction software catches typed names in analysis output reasonably well, but even its makers say it is incomplete: Presidio's documentation cautions that automated detection cannot be counted on to find every sensitive item and calls for added safeguards. Handwritten initials, stamp impressions and scanned title blocks need a human reviewer working from a written checklist.
| Item | Action |
|---|---|
| Seal, signature and license number | Remove from every page |
| Project name, address and client name | Replace with building type, region and role labels |
| Engineer and checker names or initials | Replace with consistent role labels such as designer and checker |
| Title blocks and page headers | Strip, or replace with neutral labels |
| Design criteria and code editions | Keep |
| Load assumptions and combinations | Keep |
| Check notes and corrections | Keep, with names removed |
| Revision history | Keep the sequence; shift or generalize dates if required |
Does analysis software affect what can be licensed?#
Analysis software affects licensing in two ways: through its license terms and through its file formats. Firms generally treat the reports they produce with tools such as RISA, ETABS, SAP2000, RAM or Enercalc as their own work product, but end user license terms vary, and some restrict redistributing embedded libraries, templates or databases. Check the terms for each tool in scope.
File formats matter to buyers. Native model files may need the original software to open, so many packages pair a PDF of the output with a structured summary of inputs, such as loads, materials and member schedules, that a developer can use without the software.
Illustrative: a structural firm prepares a calc sample#
Illustrative: a fictional structural engineering firm that designs wood-frame mid-rise housing, steel office buildings and parking structures reviews its calculation archive. Packages live on a file server as Mathcad worksheets, analysis model files and scanned hand calcs, with checker comments in Bluebeam.
Contract review shows most projects under owner-engineer agreements that keep ownership with the firm. The CEO approves a sample from those projects, excluding delegated designs, peer reviews and a confidential data center campus. Preparation removes seals, names and title blocks, keeps criteria, load assumptions and checker comments, and pairs each package with a structured input summary. The sample goes to a fit check before any wider scope is set.
How SourceX approaches calculation records#
SourceX approaches calculation records through the SourceX five-step transaction, starting with a fit check that asks only about project types, years, file formats and known restrictions. No calculation pages change hands at that point.
For packages that go forward, the SourceX Evidence Packet records the provenance of each package, the licensing rights relied on, the permitted use including any bar on design reliance, the privacy record of what was removed and the firm's release authorization. Records are licensed, not sold, so the firm keeps ownership.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need client permission to license calc packages?
Not always. Where the contract leaves ownership with the firm and imposes no confidentiality on the work, client permission may not be required, though some firms still notify key clients. Where ownership transferred or confidentiality applies, the project needs written permission or stays out.
Are scanned hand calculations useful?
Often, yes. Hand calcs show reasoning step by step, which developers value. They also need the most careful preparation, because initials, stamps and project names appear in handwriting that automated tools can miss.
Could a licensee use our calcs to design a building?
The license should prohibit it. Permitted use terms can bar reliance on licensed records for design, construction or permitting, and removing seals and approval statements means nothing appears approved. Counsel drafts that language for each agreement.
What about calcs for buildings that later had problems?
Projects with failures, claims or legal holds are excluded. Even after a claim closes, many firms leave those packages out because the records are sensitive and their value does not outweigh the risk.
Should we keep calc packages longer if we plan to license them?
Retention should follow the firm's policy set with counsel, not a licensing plan. A license uses a prepared copy, while the original package remains governed by the firm's schedule and by any hold counsel has issued.
How large should a first sample of calc packages be?
There is no fixed size. A first sample should represent the firm's main structure types and materials, include packages with checker comments and revisions, and come only from projects that passed the rights review. Buyers indicate what volume interests them after seeing the sample and the metadata behind it.
Sources
- Presidio's documentation warns that because it uses automated detection mechanisms, there is no guarantee that Presidio will find all sensitive information, and additional systems and protections should be employed. Source
- EJCDC E-500 Owner-Engineer agreement language (2014 edition excerpt) states that all Documents are instruments of service and the Engineer retains an ownership and property interest therein, including the copyright and the right of reuse, whether or not the Project is completed. Source
Related resources
- InsightSelling an MEP engineering firm: what buyers value in 2026
- IndustryConstruction data
- QuestionDo AI labs buy code?
- InsightCan you license CAD and engineering drawings to AI companies?
- InsightCan you license code reviews and pull requests to AI companies?
- SolutionEnterprise data: the records of how organizations actually work
See if your company qualifies
A short company assessment. No data uploads are needed.