Definitions and comparisons

Right to use vs right to access: how ASC 606 treats a data license

By SourceX Editorial · Reviewed by Noah Loul · October 9, 2026

Short answer

Under ASC 606, a right to use covers intellectual property as it exists when the license starts, and revenue is generally recognized at a point in time; a right to access depends on the licensor's ongoing activities, and revenue is recognized over time. A one-time dataset snapshot often resembles a right to use, but auditors decide from contract facts.

Key takeaways

Right to use generally means point-in-time revenue; right to access generally means revenue over the license period.
Whether a dataset license is a license of intellectual property at all is a judgment for the company and its auditors.
Promised refreshes, preparation work and hosting may be separate performance obligations with their own timing.
Usage-based fees on a license of IP are generally recognized only as the usage occurs, under the royalty exception.
License revenue is not recognized before the data is available to the buyer and the license period has begun.

What do right to use and right to access mean?#

Right to use and right to access are the two ways ASC 606 describes what a license of intellectual property gives a customer. A right to use covers the IP as it exists when the license is granted, and revenue is generally recognized at a point in time. A right to access covers the IP as it changes over the license period, and revenue is recognized over time.

US GAAP reaches the answer through a classification added by ASU 2016-10. Functional IP has significant standalone functionality, such as software that performs a task or media that can be played. Symbolic IP, such as a brand, trade name or franchise right, draws its usefulness from the licensor's past or ongoing activities and is treated as a right to access.

A functional IP license can still be recognized over time when the licensor is expected to substantively change the IP's functionality and the customer must use the updated version. That exception is where data refresh arrangements need the most careful analysis.

Is a data license a license of intellectual property?#

A data license is not automatically a license of intellectual property for ASC 606 purposes, and that question comes before right to use or right to access. The standard's examples of IP licenses include software and technology, media and entertainment, franchises, patents, trademarks and copyrights. Datasets are not named, so the company and its auditors judge each arrangement.

How the data reaches the buyer drives much of that judgment. Delivered files the buyer can keep and use look very different from a hosted query service the buyer can reach only through the seller's systems.

Files delivered to the buyer with a license to use them for defined purposes: often analyzed as a license.
Hosted access where the buyer queries records on the seller's platform: often analyzed as a service.
A transfer of all rights with no continuing seller ownership: may be a sale rather than a license.
Records bundled with labeling, cleaning or custom collection: may include separate service obligations.

01Your work records
02Personal details removed
03You approve the release
04Licensed to AI developers

How it works with SourceX: Your work records → Personal details removed → You approve the release → Licensed to AI developers.Illustrative

Snapshot vs updated feed: how timing usually follows#

A historical snapshot and an updated feed usually land on different sides of the timing line. The table summarizes common patterns as a starting point for the conversation with auditors, not as conclusions.

Snapshot vs updated feed: how timing usually follows
Arrangement	Common analysis	Typical timing pattern	Key judgment
One-time delivery of a historical archive under a perpetual license	Right to use	Point in time, when delivered and the license period begins	Whether any ongoing obligations remain
Snapshot under a fixed-term license	Right to use	Point in time at the start of the term	Whether renewals are separate contracts recognized later
Snapshot plus scheduled refreshes delivered as new files	Right to use for each delivery, often separate performance obligations	Point in time for each delivery as it occurs	How the price is allocated across deliveries
Continuously updated feed the buyer must use in its latest form	May be right to access or a service	Over time across the license period	Whether updates substantively change what the buyer receives
Hosted query access on the seller's platform	Often a service, not a license	Over time as access is provided	Whether the buyer could take possession of the records
Usage-based fee, such as per model trained or per use	Sales- or usage-based royalty	As the usage occurs, or later if the obligation is not yet satisfied	Whether the license is the predominant item

Refreshes, preparation and other performance obligations#

Performance obligations in a data deal are the distinct promises the seller makes, and each can carry its own timing. A single contract might promise a historical archive, future refreshes, preparation work such as removing personal details, and support during the buyer's integration.

If those promises are distinct, the transaction price is allocated across them and each is recognized when it is satisfied. A company that books an entire multi-delivery contract when the first archive ships can overstate early revenue, and a company that spreads everything evenly can understate it.

Renewals follow their own rule. Under ASC 606-10-55-58C, revenue from a license renewal is recognized no earlier than the start of the renewal period, even if the renewal is signed and paid before then.

Usage-based fees and the royalty exception#

Usage-based fees on a data license are generally recognized only as the usage occurs, under what practitioners call the royalty exception. ASC 606-10-55-65 requires revenue from a sales- or usage-based royalty promised for a license of IP to be recognized at the later of the usage or the satisfaction of the performance obligation the royalty relates to.

Under ASC 606-10-55-65A, the exception applies when the royalty relates only to a license of IP or when the license is the predominant item. Where a data license is bundled with substantial services, the predominance question needs an answer before the exception can be used. Minimum guarantees add another layer, because the fixed floor and the variable amount above it are often analyzed separately.

Illustrative: a vertical software company's first data license#

Illustrative: a fictional vertical software company licenses a historical package of resolved Zendesk tickets linked to Jira issues and release notes. The contract also promises periodic refreshes of newly resolved tickets and a preparation service that removes customer names and account details before delivery.

The CFO's first instinct is to book the whole fee when the archive ships. Working with the auditors, the team instead separates the historical archive from the refreshes. The archive is treated as a right to use and recognized at delivery, each refresh is recognized when it is delivered, and the preparation work is assessed as part of delivering the archive rather than a separate promise to the buyer.

The result is less revenue in the signing quarter than the board expected, and a clear schedule the auditors can test. The board approves the deal on that basis, and the sales team learns to describe refreshes in the contract as distinct deliveries.

What to bring to your auditor before you sign#

The documents to bring to your auditor are the ones that show exactly what is promised, delivered and paid. Raising timing questions before signature costs less than restating afterward, and contract wording can often be adjusted to match the commercial intent.

The draft license, including the grant, permitted use, term and any exclusivity.
The delivery schedule: historical archive, refreshes and any hosted access.
Any obligation for the buyer to use updated versions of the records.
Preparation, labeling or support services and how they are priced.
Payment terms: upfront fees, minimum guarantees, usage-based fees and any credits.
Termination, refund and clawback rights.

How SourceX documents deliveries for finance teams#

SourceX does not provide accounting advice, but its process produces the records an audit needs. Each package moves through the SourceX five-step transaction: Supply, Rights, Preparation, Approval and Delivery, and the supplier approves release before anything ships.

The SourceX Evidence Packet records provenance, licensing rights, permitted use, the privacy record and release authorization for each delivery. Dated approval and delivery records help finance teams match revenue to what was actually transferred.

Frequently asked questions

Does IFRS 15 use the same right to use and right to access distinction?

Yes, with different mechanics. IFRS 15 paragraph B56 asks whether a licence gives a right to access the IP throughout the licence period or a right to use it as it exists when granted. Instead of functional and symbolic labels, paragraph B58 uses criteria about whether the licensor's activities significantly affect the IP.

Is a perpetual data license always recognized at a point in time?

Not always. A perpetual license of a fixed archive often supports point-in-time recognition, but promised updates, required use of the latest version, hosting or bundled services can change the analysis. Duration alone does not decide the timing; the nature of what is promised does.

When does revenue start if the license is signed before the data is delivered?

Generally not before the data is made available to the buyer and the license period has begun. A contract signed in one quarter for an archive delivered in the next usually produces revenue in the later quarter, even if cash arrives earlier.

Does a private company need to follow ASC 606 for a data license?

Private companies that prepare financial statements under US GAAP apply ASC 606, often because lenders, investors or a future acquirer expect audited or reviewed statements. Companies on cash or tax-basis reporting follow different rules, but the analysis still matters if a buyer of the business will later restate to GAAP.

Is tax timing the same as ASC 606 timing?

Not necessarily. Tax rules have their own timing for advance payments and royalties, so book and tax revenue from the same data license can differ. Ask your tax advisor to review the contract alongside your auditor so both timelines are planned before signing.

Sources

ASU 2016-10 classifies IP as functional or symbolic; a license to functional IP is generally a right to use recognized at a point in time unless licensor activities substantively change its functionality and the customer must use the updated IP, while symbolic IP grants a right to access recognized over time. Source
ASC 606-10-55-54 gives as examples of IP licenses software and technology; motion pictures, music and other media and entertainment; franchises; and patents, trademarks and copyrights. Source
ASC 606-10-55-58C provides that license revenue is not recognized before the IP is made available and the license period begins, so renewal revenue is recognized no earlier than the start of the renewal period. Source
ASC 606-10-55-65 requires sales- or usage-based royalty revenue on a license of IP to be recognized at the later of the usage or satisfaction of the related performance obligation; 55-65A applies the exception when the royalty relates only to a license of IP or the license is the predominant item. Source
IFRS 15 paragraph B56 requires an entity to determine whether a licence provides a right to access IP throughout the licence period or a right to use IP as it exists when the licence is granted. Source
Under IFRS 15 paragraph B58, a licence is a right to access when the entity is expected to undertake activities that significantly affect the IP, the customer is exposed to their effects, and those activities do not transfer a good or service. Source

Related resources

See if your company qualifies

A short company assessment. No data uploads are needed.

Check your deal terms before you sign Talk to SourceX