Skip to content

Manufacturing

Process historian data: what to keep, archive and license

By SourceX Editorial · Updated

Short answer

Keep full-resolution process historian data for signals around batches, alarms, quality outcomes and equipment failures; compress steady utility signals; discard only true duplicates and diagnostic noise after checking retention duties. Historian data becomes licensable when tags are documented and time-aligned with batch records, work orders and quality results, and when recipes and setpoints are carved out.

Key takeaways

  • Compression settings chosen to save storage can erase the transients AI developers most want to study.
  • Alarms, operator actions and signals near failures or quality events deserve full resolution.
  • A tag dictionary with units, ranges and asset hierarchy turns raw time series into usable records.
  • Setpoints, recipes and safety system details stay out of a licensed package.
  • Export raw archives and configuration before retiring or upgrading a historian.

Why historian data matters for AI now#

Historian data matters for AI because models of physical processes learn from how signals move around events: start-ups, upsets, alarms, grade changes and failures. Those moments are short, and they are exactly what aggressive compression and summary-only archives tend to flatten.

Historians are often configured to save storage, with deadbands and compression tuned for trend displays rather than analysis. Plants also tend to keep hourly or shift averages longer than raw values. Both choices were sensible for operations, but they leave gaps for anyone who wants to learn from the full sequence of an event.

AI developers working on process control, predictive maintenance and operator assistance all need this sequence-level detail. A summary row showing that a batch finished out of specification is far less useful than the stretch of signals that led there.

Keep, compress or discard: a decision table by signal type#

The decision table below sorts historian signals by how much value they lose under compression. Check regulatory, quality and customer retention requirements before discarding anything, since those set the floor regardless of AI value.

Keep, compress or discard: a decision table by signal type
Signal typeExamplesRecommendationReason
Process variables during runs and batchesTemperatures, pressures, flows, speedsKeep full resolutionTransients explain quality and yield outcomes
Alarms and eventsAlarm journal, operator acknowledgments, mode changesKeep everythingShows what operators saw and did
Quality-linked signalsInline gauges, vision results, checkweigher readingsKeep full resolutionLinks process behavior to outcomes
Equipment healthVibration, motor current, bearing temperatureKeep full resolution near failures, compress otherwiseThe lead-up to failure is the valuable part
Setpoints and recipe parametersTarget values, recipe downloadsKeep internally, exclude from licensingOften trade secrets
UtilitiesCompressed air, chilled water, building HVACCompressFew events, moderate value
Diagnostic and heartbeat tagsCommunication status, watchdog countersDiscard after reviewNo process meaning
Duplicate tagsSame signal stored in SCADA and the historianKeep one source of recordAvoids conflicting copies

What makes historian data usable by someone else#

Historian data becomes usable by someone else when its context travels with it. A list of tag names and values means little to an AI developer without the information that explains what each tag measures and what the plant was doing at the time.

Most of this context already exists somewhere, in the historian configuration, the control system documentation, batch records and shift logs. Historians such as AVEVA PI, Proficy Historian, Canary and the historian modules built into SCADA platforms each store tag configuration and compression settings in their own way, so export that configuration alongside the values and check that it matches the period being shared.

  • A tag dictionary with descriptions, engineering units, ranges and the asset each tag belongs to.
  • Time zone and clock source, plus notes on daylight saving changes and known clock drift.
  • Compression and sampling settings in force for each period, since they change what the data can show.
  • Links to batch or run IDs, product codes, work orders and nonconformance records.
  • Operator logs and shift notes that explain upsets, changes and interventions.
  • Records of instrument replacements and calibrations that cause shifts in the data.

Who controls historian data in a plant?#

The plant operator usually controls historian data from its own equipment, but three situations need a closer look. Vendor-hosted historians and cloud data platforms run under subscription terms that govern export. Skids and machines supplied with remote monitoring may send data to the equipment maker under its own agreement. Toll processing and contract manufacturing customers may claim rights in process data from their products.

Map each source to the agreement that covers it before planning an archive or a license. A short table of historian, assets covered, hosting model and governing contract is enough to show where the open questions sit.

What to keep out of a historian license#

A historian license should keep out the parameters and details that are competitively or operationally sensitive: recipes, setpoints, tuning constants, safety instrumented system details, network addresses and operator identities. Removing them is usually possible without destroying the value of the remaining signals.

Process variables can often be shared as measured values while the targets that drove them stay private. Where customer-specific processes run under contract, check whether the customer's terms cover process data as well as product specifications. Security-sensitive details, such as control network layouts and system versions, stay out even when everything else is cleared.

How to protect history before a historian migration#

Protecting history before a historian migration means exporting raw archives and configuration first, while the old system and the people who know it are still available. A migration may move only tag configuration and a recent window of data, leaving older archives on a server due for decommissioning.

Ask the people who configured the system what they know about gaps, renamed tags and periods of instrument trouble. That knowledge is rarely written down, and it leaves with them. Extract from a historian replica on the business network or from copied archive files, never by opening a new path into the control network.

  • Step 1: list every historian, SCADA archive and data collector, including retired ones still on servers.
  • Step 2: export tag configuration, compression settings and the asset model.
  • Step 3: copy raw archive files to storage the company controls, with checksums.
  • Step 4: confirm the archive can be read outside the old system, or keep a working reader.
  • Step 5: record date ranges, gaps and known instrument changes in a short archive note.

Illustrative: a coatings plant rethinks its historian settings#

Illustrative: a fictional specialty coatings plant runs batch reactors and dispersion mills. During a historian upgrade, the OT director finds that compression deadbands had flattened reactor temperature transients for years, while shift averages had been kept indefinitely.

The team changes the settings so reactor and mill signals are stored at full resolution during batch windows, keeps the alarm journal in full and compresses utility tags. It exports the old archive with its configuration before the previous server is decommissioned.

When the company later reviews licensing, it scopes alarm journals, operator logs and batch outcome records linked to process variables, with recipes, setpoints and customer-specific formulations removed. The flattened years are documented as lower resolution rather than hidden.

How SourceX approaches historian archives#

SourceX starts a historian review with metadata only: which historians and SCADA archives exist, how many years they cover, at what resolution in each period, and which batch records, alarm journals and work orders can be linked to them. No tag data is shared at that stage.

Packages then move through the SourceX five-step transaction of Supply, Rights, Preparation, Approval and Delivery, with recipes, setpoints and control-network details removed during Preparation. Historian archives are often large, so they are delivered from the company's own servers or on encrypted drives; SourceX never hosts multi-terabyte datasets. A SourceX Evidence Packet records provenance, licensing rights, permitted use, the privacy record and release authorization, and the archive note on resolution and gaps travels with it.

Frequently asked questions

Should we turn compression off entirely?

Not necessarily. Full resolution on every tag can strain storage and network capacity. Prioritize critical process, alarm and equipment-health tags, test the impact on a few assets, and document the settings so anyone using the data knows what each period can show.

Can historian data be licensed without batch or MES context?

It can, but it is far less useful. At minimum, align it with shift logs, alarm journals and production schedules so a buyer knows what the plant was making and what happened during upsets.

Is sensor data personal data?

Usually not on its own. Operator IDs on events, badge records and log entries tied to named individuals can be, so they are removed or coded during preparation. Privacy rules that may apply are assessed with counsel.

Our historian is hosted by a vendor. Who controls exports?

Your subscription terms decide the export route, limits and any charges for bulk extraction. Check them before planning an archive or a license, and confirm the vendor will provide raw values rather than only aggregated views.

How long should we keep raw historian data?

Start with regulatory, quality and customer retention requirements, which set the minimum. Beyond that, longer histories that span seasons, equipment changes and product mixes give AI developers more variation to learn from.

Are alarm floods and nuisance alarms worth keeping?

Yes. Alarm floods show how operators prioritized under pressure, and nuisance alarms show where limits were poorly set. Keep the full alarm journal, including shelved and suppressed alarms, and document any alarm rationalization so a buyer can see when limits changed.

Related resources

See if your company qualifies

A short company assessment. No data uploads are needed.

See if you qualify