Skip to content

Hand Tool Use Demonstrations

By Noah Loul · Reviewed by Noah Loul · Updated

  1. 01Your data spec
  2. 02Matched to businesses
  3. 03Rights and samples reviewed
  4. 04Licensed delivery
How it works with SourceX: Your data spec → Matched to businesses → Rights and samples reviewed → Licensed delivery.Illustrative

Short answer

Hand tool use demonstrations show people selecting, gripping and working screwdrivers, wrenches, pliers and hammers on real fasteners and parts. Video, hand pose and tool pose can support tool-use perception and step understanding. They record neither the torque a wrench applied nor how a fastener resisted, so contact-rich tool control needs instrumented tools or robot data. Repair shops, training providers and commissioned recording are the main routes.

The buyer's problem

Maintenance, assembly and installation all run on hand tools, which makes tool use a core skill family for humanoid programs aimed at those jobs. Business footage of this work is usually recorded for another purpose: the tool tip disappears behind the hand, nobody noted which fastener it was, and the tightening force was never measured. A buyer has to separate footage that shows the skill from footage that merely shows someone nearby.

This page covers hand-operated tools. Drills, drivers and grinders are in power tool use demonstrations, whole repair jobs in repair video demonstrations, and finding tools in a drawer in tool identification image data.

Task anatomy

PhaseWhat happensCommon failuresData that helps
SelectMatch tool type and size to the fastenerWrong size; wrong drive typeTool and fastener IDs on every clip
Acquire and gripPick up the tool and take a grip suited to the force neededPoor grip; forced regripEgocentric and wrist views; grasp-type labels
EngageSeat the tip or jaws on the fastener or partDriver slipping out of the head (cam-out); misalignment; rounded headClose view of tip and fastener; tool and hand pose
ApplyTurn, lever, squeeze or strikeSlip; over- or under-tightening; stripped threadInstrumented-tool torque; otherwise an outcome label only
RepositionRatchet back, regrip, brace with the other handLosing engagementContinuous video; bimanual labels
Verify and stowCheck seating or tightness; put the tool awaySkipped check; dropped toolStep end markers and outcome labels

Environment changes the task as much as the tool does. A fastener on a bench, on a vertical panel, overhead or in a recess calls for different postures, and access constraints are covered in tool use in tight and awkward spaces.

Tool families differ in what carries the skill

Tool familyWhat carries the skillWhat video showsWhat it hides
Screwdrivers and hex keysAxial pressure plus rotationRotation, hand posturePressure; early cam-out
Wrenches, sockets and ratchetsTorque through a lever arm, braced by the other handArm and hand motion, stroke countTorque applied; fastener resistance
Pliers and cuttersGrip force and leverageJaw closure, hand postureGrip force; material resistance
Hammers and malletsSwing path and impactTrajectory, strike positionImpact force

In each row the visible part is the motion, while the part that decides success is largely a force.

What published work shows

TACO is the closest purpose-built reference. It contains 2.5K bimanual motion sequences across tool-action-object combinations, recorded with 12 third-person views plus one egocentric view by combining multi-view sensing with optical motion capture, and annotates hand-object 3D meshes, 2D segmentation and behavior triplets (Liu et al., 2024). It shows what richly annotated tool use looks like when capture is designed around a motion-capture setup; it is not workplace footage.

HANDAL annotates tools as objects, with category-level pose and scale and handle affordance segmentation (Guo et al., 2023). It tells a model where the handle is, not how to use it.

Ego-Exo4D recorded skilled activities, bike repair among them, from egocentric and several exocentric cameras with expert commentary, and includes proficiency estimation among its benchmarks (Grauman et al., 2023). The lesson for buyers is the combination of viewpoints and spoken expertise.

Force is where video stops; when video is not enough lists the tasks affected. DexCap's portable hand capture tracks motion but records no force (Wang et al., 2024), whereas RH20T logs force with each of its contact-rich robot sequences and pairs each with a human demonstration video (Fang et al., 2023). Buyers typically need that pairing: human demonstrations for task structure and robot data for contact. For the general argument, see what human demonstration video can and cannot do.

Labeling grips

A published taxonomy gives annotators a shared vocabulary: it identifies 33 grasp types, reducible to 17 general grasps when object shape and size are ignored (Feix et al., 2016). It covers static, stable one-handed grasps, so the regrips, support hands and sliding grips of real tool use need extra labels. A humanoid hand may also realize only a subset of human grasps, which is why tool affordances and grasp annotations matters as a separate layer.

Where demonstrations come from

SourceWhat may existStrengthWatch for
Repair shops and dealer service departmentsShop cameras, technician body cameras, training clipsReal fasteners and real failuresTool tip hidden; customers' property in frame; uneven framing
Training and vocational providersInstructional demonstrations and practical-assessment recordingsClean, repeated, often narrated tasksStaged happy paths; course copyright; see vocational training and practical-assessment recordings
Commissioned recordingSessions designed around chosen tools, fasteners and camerasCoverage, labels and consent designed inCost, site access, demonstrator recruitment
Instrumented sessionsTorque or force logged during human workThe missing signalSpecialist capture; see instrumented tools

Existing footage is cheaper but was framed for another purpose; existing footage vs commissioned recording covers the trade-off. Camera placement guidance is in the head-mounted camera capture specification.

Illustrative capture specification

# Illustrative only: synthetic ids; every parameter is the buyer's to set
session: handtool_bench_017
operators: operator_A12, operator_B07, operator_C31   # consented; skill levels recorded
workpieces: test_board_T4 (hex, Phillips, slotted fasteners in several sizes), panel_P2
tools: tool_inst_0417 (13 mm ring wrench), tool_inst_0088 (ratchet, 3/8 drive)
postures: [bench_level, vertical_panel, overhead, recessed]
cameras:
  head: egocentric, headband mount
  wrist: left and right
  side: one fixed view focused on the tool tip
  sync: shared clock; offset measured at start and end of each session
scripted_variants: [correct_size, deliberately_wrong_size, seized_fastener, dropped_tool_recovery]
annotations: tool_id, fastener_id, step_segments, grasp_type, hand_visibility,
             outcome (seated | tightened | slipped | rounded | abandoned), regrip_count
optional: torque-logging tool, units and sampling rate stated, clock-synced to video
excluded: robot actions, joint states, grip force (unless instrumented)

Requirements depend on architecture, tool family and embodiment; there is no universal volume that suffices. How many demonstrations you need summarizes what published studies used.

What this data cannot support

  • Applied torque and grip force. Neither is recorded in video; both need an instrumented tool or robot data.
  • Feel. Detecting that a thread is cross-threading or a fastener is about to strip is largely tactile.
  • Gloved or occluded hands. Work gloves and the part itself often hide the grip; see gloved hands and PPE in workplace video.
  • Human-to-humanoid hand transfer. Human hands and a humanoid's hands differ in degrees of freedom, strength and reach; see the human-to-humanoid embodiment gap.
  • Rare cases. Seized, corroded or damaged fasteners are unusual in routine footage; see difficult and failed repairs.

Expect preparation work: synchronization and calibration, tool pose tracking, 3D hand pose and hand-object interaction labels.

Quality and acceptance criteria

  1. Visibility. The share of engage and apply frames in which tool tip and fastener are both visible is reported per clip; the threshold is yours.
  2. Identification. Every clip carries tool and fastener IDs.
  3. Failures retained. Slips, corrections and abandoned attempts are kept and labeled.
  4. Condition coverage. Counts by posture, access, fastener size, tool family and finish.
  5. Operator and part splits. Held-out sets are separated by operator and by fastener or part type, per training vs evaluation datasets.
  6. Synchronization. Measured offsets between cameras, and between video and any torque log, are documented.
  7. Torque data. If present, units, calibration and sampling rate are stated.
  8. Annotation agreement. Step boundaries and outcomes are double-labeled on a sample.

Questions to ask suppliers

  1. Can you show clips in which the tool tip and fastener stay visible through engagement?
  2. Which tool families, sizes and fastener types appear, and are they identified per clip?
  3. Were any recordings staged, re-enacted or edited for training or marketing?
  4. Are slips, stripped fasteners and corrections kept in?
  5. Which camera positions and mounts were used, and do they vary within the archive?
  6. Is any torque, force or tightening data logged, and how is it synchronized?
  7. Who appears in frame or owns the work shown: employees, customers, vehicles?
  8. Who owns the footage: you, a training vendor or a tool manufacturer?

Permissions and provenance

Hands-on work involves people, customers' property and often a manufacturer's branded tools or course content. Consent and bystander questions are covered in worker consent and identifiable people, and content owned by others in third-party content in workplace recordings. Ask whether participants were employees, trainees or students, and who gave notice to each. Redaction does not settle whether footage may be licensed. This is not legal advice.

Discuss your requirements

If you need hand tool footage, describe the tools, tasks, camera views and permitted uses to SourceX. SourceX investigates whether US businesses hold suitable recordings, checks the data and the supplier's licensing permissions, and coordinates the license and delivery. If no existing footage fits, SourceX can scope a commissioned collection. SourceX's role is sourcing, rights review, licensing and delivery coordination; annotation and specialist capture partners can be arranged case by case, and a request does not guarantee a match.

Start from the maintenance, repair and tool-use hub or the humanoid training data guide. The catalog entry for first-person video of skilled manual work and the page on egocentric video of manual work describe the related record type.

Describe the workplace demonstration data your robotics project needs

Sources

Frequently asked questions

What do hand tool use demonstrations show, and what do they miss?

They show people selecting, gripping and working screwdrivers, wrenches, pliers and hammers on real fasteners and parts. They record neither the torque a wrench applied nor how a fastener resisted, so contact-rich tool control needs instrumented tools or robot data.

Why does the visible motion of a hand tool not reveal whether the task succeeded?

In each tool family the visible part is the motion, while the part that decides success is largely a force. Pressure on a screwdriver, torque through a wrench and grip force on pliers are not visible, so the outcome often needs a separate label.

Where should a buyer look for hand tool demonstrations, and what consent questions arise?

Repair shops, training providers, commissioned sessions and instrumented sessions are the main routes. Buyers should ask whether participants were employees, trainees or students and who gave each one notice, since the work also involves customers' property and branded tools.

Describe the data your robots need

Describe the tasks, modalities and permitted uses you need. SourceX reviews the requirement and follows up about potential sources; a request does not guarantee a match.

Discuss your humanoid training-data requirements with SourceX
See if you qualify